What Live Optics collects, and what it quietly does not
First in a short series on the tool everyone runs before a storage or platform proposal. Knowing the shape of the data is the difference between a sizing and a guess.
VMware, AHV, KubeVirt, and life after the renewal.
First in a short series on the tool everyone runs before a storage or platform proposal. Knowing the shape of the data is the difference between a sizing and a guess.
Last in the Live Optics series. The arithmetic between the data and the recommendation is where every argument happens, and it is almost always invisible.
Most people open the VMware renewal at the total. That number is the last thing you should look at, and by then you have already lost the argument.
AHV will run your VMs. That was never the risky part. The risk is in the twenty things around the VM that you forgot were vSphere features.
Everybody starts with the same spreadsheet. Almost nobody reads the twelve columns that change the answer, and every vendor tool quietly fills the gaps in its own favour.
Sequencing is where platform migrations succeed or fail. Here is the ordering logic I use, and why the first wave should be boring on purpose.
Every estate has them. Powered on, consuming capacity, owned by no one, named something like SRV-TEMP-02. Here is a decommissioning process that is safe and actually completes.
It is in the licence you already own, it runs production for very large organisations, and it is routinely left off shortlists for reasons that stopped being true a decade ago.
It went from a homelab favourite to a serious contender fast. The technology is sound; the questions worth asking are about support, scale and who operates it.